/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>442060
At the risk of sounding like a lolbert boomer removing money from the gold standard to free up more money that can be pumped into capitalism and that can be pocketed using financial fuckery.

>>441941
Because they won't do many sales without PROGRAMMATED OBSOLESCENCE.

>>454309
>Because they won't do many sales without PROGRAMMATED OBSOLESCENCE.
No that is not really true, people always want the shiny new thing, if the old stuff is durable, it gets sold to the second hand market. Without planned obsolescence stuff would just be handed down more, and society would collectively be richer. I think they are doing this to keep poorer people from having access to nice things.

>>442060
> I dont know what happened in 1971 but ever since that year technological innovation has accelerated in quantity but decelerated in actual quality
dafaq does this even mean

also the few companies that do produce useful tech are almost always gov contractors

>>454351
Gonna start in two minutes

Test

Missed it…

>>430907
All revolutionary acts will kill workers. Its a class WAR for a reason
Not taking any action kills many more workers, as their exploitation is continually reproduced

>>430895
You are legitimately a fucking psychopath and belong in a gulag.

redpill yourselves at once, muh "covid"
>they are killing people at hospitals
>then they count the death as if from cov

>>440934
based, if you see a richfag, take your mask off and just start coofing, coof, coof, coof

I tried. I really tried. But I wasted my time, it doesn't work. It turned out viruses aren't even real. lol

>>444044
obssesed

>>443875
Yeah. The Freemasons emerged from medieval guilds in the Western world where apprenticeship is very important. Young people would choose a "master" in a particular field, and professionals would group up in guilds to protect themselves, like for carpenters and… masons. That was the basis for what became these secret societies of bourgeoisie in England in the 1700s. When it came to America, it was a secret society for bankers, judges, wealthy businessmen, and politicians.

>>443868
>They are filled with conspiracy theories all over the net.
Yes. I think ultra-conservatives dislike the Freemasons because they see them as spinning powerful webs to spark revolutions.

Today, I suppose the Freemasons are pretty old-fashioned now. It's like old men who want to get away from their wives, while the upper bourgeoisie today have the World Economic Forum and so forth. The right-wing conspiracy theories don't really talk about the "New World Order" either anymore but the "Great Reset." And this is viewed in highly Manichean terms, like an "evil" plot to enslave the world. But the people at the top of the capitalist world don't see themselves as evil. They think they're doing good for the world, or doing things that will benefit everyone, whether that's the reality or not.

But I'd almost say the Freemasons in the 1700s-1800s were like the Protestant bourgeoise's alternative to the Catholic Church's upper crust of priests and cardinals. And they were at odds with each other, because the Freemasons discouraged Catholics from joining, and the Catholic Church issued injunctions against the Freemasons. There are ultra-conservative Catholics who also feared a Masonic-Judaic alliance. Jewish bankers and merchants worked with the Anglo capitalists who were part of the Freemasons and so forth. I imagine that's why Franco banned the Freemasons. He was an ultra-conservative Catholic leader. The Nazis of course banned Freemasonry as they were reactionary ultra-nationalists.

>China banned them
They kicked them out of the mainland. The Chinese freemasons were tied up with the British and the KMT and are apparently still allowed today to exist in Hong Kong. And they havPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

It's all façade and you still look too misinformed about them. Nobody here relates them with "the protocols of zion's elders" and this speaks alarming

Do they even still exist?

>>443868
Haven't been politically relevant since the 19th century.

>>453394
The democratic republic of Korea is the way it is because of US foreign policy of overthrowing governments they don't like. North Korea also has a success story to tell, their citizens are not subjected to war. Their are many countries in the world right now that are not able to protect their citizens like that.

The idea that we can't have communism until everybody agrees is stupid, do you really think all those capitalist billionaires would ever give up their privilege to plunder the world and exploit its people, willingly ? Capitalism is torturing billions of workers with exploitation, every year 10s of millions of people are murdered with systemic violence, hundreds of thousands to millions more are destroyed with physical violence. Once all those people had enough of the despair, the suffering, the political disenfranchisement, the pointless toiling for the rich, the pointless dying… and they establish a system that works for the masses, it will be justice. And you don't get to judge the means by which this is achieved, unless you can do better and lead by example. Because the system as it is now sure as hell is not based on voluntarism.

You would be telling the people being slaughtered by fascism in WW2, that if they defend them self it's not justice unless all the Nazis agree with it.

Most communists and socialists have as personal characteristic, a strong sense of moral principle, and you are a liberal trying to use that against us.

>>453387
"the left" doesn't

The Left™ in America® sure makes it seem that way though. You have to understand that the average normlord doesn't read theory, let alone about half the people who claim to be "into politics". People like us are an extreme minority in my local town (maybe 1-3% of the population)

>>453179
do you think you really better than them?
what are you doing against what the rulng class is doing right now before your eyes?

>>453179
>Browsing places like /r/monarchism
Why are you using your tiem like this if itbupsetd you so?

>>453179
Neo-fascism is more of a spiritual/religious movement then an ideology, because they hate radlibs so much they just become their inversion. The culture war is a religious struggle, not an ideological one.

Small peebles do acumulate in the shoes of the walkers age after age, stage after stage. It's not climbing mountains what wears you out, but the peeble in your shoe.

>I am quite happy that you started to redpill yourself without falling into certain tendencies.
>Have a look at what Metapedia says about it, so you may end up deciding.

>>420795

That's like nothing. Look deeper
>embed

>>420807
>Negative eugenics involves preventing reproduction of those with dysgenic traits
>Negative eugenics, if handled with tact and concern, could be beneficial and ethical. Those with genetic defects could be incentivized by the state somehow not to reproduce, or, supposing they are not retards because of their genes, can make the ethical decision not to reproduce themselves.
If you scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds.
I would consider "believing in eugenics" as a dysgenic trait, so please don't be a retard and make the ethical decision not to reproduce your self.

>>444591
? aren't you mexican? you're saying you wouldn't want to put a baby in her >>444122 ?

>>454315
>Masons against Natives.jpg
Idealism the picture
They didn't live happily, they got slaughtered by colonial powers. They needed technology to make better weapons to defend them self.
What the fuck do you have against roads, schools and hospitals ? That's the first thing every socialist government builds more off.

>>424267
>Why do incels gravitate towards fascism
They don't though.

>>424476
This, most self proclaimed communists online are of the dirtbag left which are libs. They take a particular ire to incels because their existenence undermines both patriarchy theory and liberalism.
Incels show that not only are there men who are more marginalized than women, but that it's due to three reactionary politics of women. Incels show that women hold power over men in certain spheres of influence, and if that's true in relationships, where else is it true?

>>433268
It's hilarious how riled up women get about men they claim they don't want finding an outlet for their sexuality that's not orbiting them.

>>424316
>To elaborate look at "looking", misc on bodybuilding.com, pua forums and videos. These are all focused on how to get in better shape, discussions on how to pickup women, how to improve financial state and earn more.
This is 100% true and it's because the Western left has decided to collaborate with lib feminists that veiw the sexuality of low status men as inherently predetory. So frank converstaions about picking up women are seem as reactionary.
At best you'll get patronizing advice like "be nice" when anyone that's asked a girl in the last 15 years knows is wrong. At worst you'll be relentlessly gaslighted into believing you're a monster that women can sense.

>>454330
*that's asked a girl out

>>399571
>ctrl+f
>no tiqqun
shiggydiggy lads. Bloom Theory is essential reading despite being largely rehashed points from Revolution of Everyday Life.

>>427333
21 and up to be a communist!

>>426990
Add John Smith to the list of modern Marxists who give insight into why Marxism is a vital tool for demystifying the modern global political economy.

bump

>>399571
I did know how the bourgeoisie does. But didn't turn me into a communist. Since…
<"The moon is a harsh mistress" by Robert Heinlein

>>444362
For Germany, the criticism of religion has been essentially completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.

The profane existence of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly oratio pro aris et focis [“speech for the altars and hearths,” i.e., for God and country] has been refuted. Man, who has found only the reflection of himself in the fantastic reality of heaven, where he sought a superman, will no longer feel disposed to find the mere appearance of himself, the non-man [Unmensch], where he seeks and must seek his true reality.

The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.

Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>444421
Stfu I dont browse 4chan because I have a life outside of social media. You have the sexual impulsivity required to regularly jack your dick off to women with horrifically large eyes and voices that sound like fucking children as furrified Versions of themselves and on top of that you show blatant support for a religion known for the legalization of child marriage, rape and rewards inbreeding and with all this it's pretty easy to guess that if any woman regardless of how fat or ugly walked up to you and said they wanted to smash youd gleefully go ahead with them abandoning any of your muslim morals. I'm far far less reactionary than you faggot

>>444443
>One digit off.

<4chan is social media

Actually true lol

>>444443
strange how you would have that whole reply for someone who tells you to go back to 4chan.

Only God knows how many truths and lies are now plaguing religions after so many years, so many wars and unknown forgotten knowledge followed by innovations.

>In Kali Yuga, the hypocrisy of puritan moralists will prevail.
>Read about Kali Yuga, pls

>>451518
>if you made the mistake of trusting proprietary software get ready to spend 5-10 years in prison for crimes against the state.
I didn't made any crimes against the state though

>>451520
After a one month that account is deactivated, account is being deleted and Twitter theirselves say that they can't reach the information

You need to take your medication.

>>451514
i don't understand what this is about, you just talk about what identity these people have, but not their class status or any other relevant context , which makes it hard to figure out what is going on.

If you are in danger, you can find strength in numbers, by building a mutual security group.

>>451514
>do not want to be proud about thing that cannot be chosen
That is the weak spot, the falsehood of totalitarian right: the pride about things they did not bring, but of a forgotten irrecoverable past. Being triggered was just the proof of their flaw.
>they deserve to be roasted
>no one is safe

You want to know why they are fragile, but also know that to watch how anything works at the insides you must first… break it. Pride is a foolishness.