>>499779im not a socialist and i dont have a criticism of mamdani, my goal here is to put pressure on socialists
but just saying that reeks of being a gay copout and i should give you an example even if i dont agree with it completely so here you go
i think that mamdani represents an authentic expression of a desire for socialism
there are different kinds of socialism, at least three main camps that i can think of, and mamdani fits in what you might call the social-democratic or reformist camp
i dont think that this camp is bad, maybe electoral politics and social-democratic reforms are useful or even necessary, but they arent sufficient for socialism and always fail on their own
the reason why people like mamdani and other socdems always fuck up is that one of the main contradictions of going down a purely socdem/reformist path is that the socialist elements are dependent on the capitalist elements, so its particularly easy to force concessions
of course theyre right to point out that the political system is a plutocratic oligarchy but they cant seriously challenge it, they always end up accepting the legitimacy of capitalist politics
so its not surprising that mamdani never seriously attempted to use the power he won to do this
even just considering baby steps he couldve set a precedent to use referendums or he couldve tried to institute popular assemblies, this couldve had an effect even if it was all purely formal
in practice his socialist platform ended up just being a negotiating position to put pressure on the conservative wing of the democratic party to try and make it more "progressive" whatever that means
socialism is defined by production being subject to political decisions, so how those political decisions are made is very important, the lesson of the ussr is that while it is possible to have socialism without democracy the consequences are dire
socialists have to win the battle for democracy if they ever want a chance, what that really means is rejecting the legitimacy of the capitalist state's claim to democracy
people like mamdani (reformists who engage in electoral politics) can be useful as servants to a broader socialist movement in that battle for democracy, but they dont have a viable path to socialism on their own and are utterly awful at being leaders or even just figureheads for socialism